BUSTED in JUSTICE
presents...

Though Themba acknowledges his greatest attorney to be GOD, he is also grateful for his earthly attorney, Barry Engle, who has not only been willing to empathize with Themba's concerns of racial injustice, but has also been willing to address those concerns in the court room. For good reasons, Themba not only considers Barry to be a "kick ass" attorney, but also a friend.

If the District attorney office "truly" cared about "Parris's well being , they would have charged her with "Initiating a False Report," locked her up and sent her to rehab when she was first found to have been lying on the day of the arrest and at Grand Jury. But remember: "YOU DON'T HAVE TO CALL A PERSON A NIGG** TO TREAT THEM LIKE ONE!" FACTS! DDA Hermann was so hungry to get a dishonest conviction out of Themba that she "intentionally" overlooked Parris's malicious lies and deceitfully used those lies to secure the indictment. To date, DDA Hermann has expressed no concern that Parris's "white" lies, almost cost a "BLACK OREGONIAN" his life! Parris accused Themba of raping and kidnapping her at gun-point, however; according to the Gresham's investigative team as well the arresting officer's, THERE WAS NO GUN AND NOT ONE SHRED OF GUN EVIDENCE. The S.W.A.T team came to the alleged crime scene with guns and rifles pointed at motel room #208 ready to kill Themba if need be all due to Parris's lying. (SEE THE NEXT SECTION THE RACIST RAPE CASE OF THEMBA KELLEY) To add further insult to a Oregonian community that has unified in solidarity with Black People to stand against racial injustice; after the DDA used Parris's" HUGE" WHITE LIES to indict Themba, the state of Oregon kicked Parris to the curb and sent her to prison for 10 years on retail theft, nine mail thefts, a stolen vehicle and aggravated identity theft; therefore SHATTERING Parris's witness credibility even further and also confirming that they NEVER cared about her in the first place. In criminal law there is something called "witness credibility. Parris's entire criminal history is impeachable! Her criminal history is saturated with offenses that include FRAUD, DECEIT AND LIES! Now she is doing 10 years on more offenses that ALL involve deceit, fraud and lying. And these are new convictions that she received after Themba was arrested. What is further insulting is this is the same person that the state plans on relying on to give honest testimony at trial. L.A.W

To contribute to the abolishment of PROSECUTORIAL RACISM is why BUSTED IN JUSTICE has been birthed. B.I.J has taken the last year to gather the most potent evidentiary elements of Kelley's horrifically racist case, in order to reveal the disease of prosecutorial racism to the world.

"Thank you, Your Honor. First of all, I just want to acknowledge Aneesah Furqan, the vice president of the Oregon Assembly for Black Affairs, who's in the audience to support me. They and also the co-founder of the Love Wins Movement, Marjean Bafus. And this is definitely related to this issue. And I consider actually every time I'm in the courtroom that this issue I'm addressing is relevant." "On behalf of my various ancestral lineages, be that European, Asiatic or African, do I speak. To my great appreciation, the W. Haywood Burns Institute 2019 Racial and Ethnic Disparities Report was recently released. Finally, at last, through this very informative document have my experiences of Prosecutorial Racism in Multnomah County been at least statistically validated. The statistics are horrific and it can no longer be said that black people in Multnomah County experiencing Prosecutorial Racism are pulling the race card. Furthermore, what the R.E.D report confirms profoundly is that people of color's equal protection of the law 14th Amendment constitutional guarantees are being violated in droves. My current situation is no different. Ray Charles, Hellen Keller, blind, dead and six feet underneath the Earth could easily see that I am being maliciously and selectively prosecuted by some, not all, misinformed persons in the District Attorney's Office. Nonetheless, still my eyes remain on the prize, victory, love and freedom. Last to the State, all black men do not carry guns. Like I said on the day of my arrest, I have not carried one in over 30 years. Furthermore, God will not allow the State to squeeze me into its racially biased box of witness false statements, prior inconsistent statements and its plethora of grand jury perjury. Thank you. During this same proceeding, Judge Aubrecht invoked the term "PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT" after Themba's attorney Barry Engle justifiably and very effectively accused DDA Hermann of intentionally condoning and not correcting perjured testimony.

According to Parris, directly after the rape allegedly concluded, Themba requested that she contact her friends so they could have a three-some.  According to Parris, it was for this reason that they left the motel, got into the vehicle and road up the street in order to locate Parris's friend. Not able to find Parris's friend, they stopped at a 7- Eleven. Parris then alleged that Kelley was able to convince Olivia (a random female that neither one of them knew) to come back to the motel to party with them.   Parris further alleged that it was during this 3 minute period in the 7-Eleven lot, that she began texting her girlfriend and her girlfriends husband requesting that they call the police and also come rescue her.  The motel video footage captures the "so-called" rescue.            Just arriving back to the motel, the video displays  Kelley, Parris and Olivia exiting the vehicle. The video displays Parris standing next to the vehicle, as Kelley and Olivia both walk towards room #208 with neither one of them paying attention to Parris. A couple of minutes pass and Parris (seemingly upset), jumps into her vehicle (which was parked right next to Kelley's) and peels out of the parking space. As this is happening the video displays Mr. Cisco (Parris's girlfriends husband) walking through the motel lot towards Parris's vehicle just as it is peeling out. He is in hot rescue pursuit.  Rightfully so, he believes that a woman has been raped.    The video displays Parris's vehicle abruptly stopping and Mr. Cisco hops into Parris's vehicle. The video displays Kelley and Olivia (still not paying any attention to Parris) continuing on to the motel room. The video displays Parris and Mr. Cisco peeling out of the motel lot. In other words, it was Mr. Cisco and also his wife that were in Parris's presence no more than 20 minutes after Parris' was allegedly sexually assaulted. Based upon the above evidentiary reality, it would seem that Mr. Cisco would be an excellent witness to support Parris's claims, right? WRONG!   MR. CISCO WILL BE TESTIFYING AGAINST PARRIS. WTF!           On the date of February 28, 2020, Kelley's private investigator Rick Gove of “Gove Enterprises Inc.” went and met with Mr. Cisco and his wife. This is what Rick reported:  Mr. Cisco said he doubted the validity of Parris's claims. I asked Mr. Cisco why he doubted the validity of Parris's claims. He said she was claiming she was beaten up and that her arm was broken, but to him she didn't look like she was beaten up and her arm did not seem broken. Mr. Cisco said he recalled she lifted up his very heavy leather jacket that he had that morning, which would have been impossible or extremely painful if her arm was broken. Mr. Cisco also said that he also observed Parris banging her arm against the car believing that she was actually trying to injure her own arm.     Mr. Cisco said based on his experience of getting to know Ms. Parris since the event occurred, he now sees her to be an extremely dishonest person. He said that he has watched her lie and con people many times. He said she even lied and scammed he and his wife. He said she stole the title the title of their car and soon after it was also stolen. (One of Parris's current charges is a possession of a stolen vehicle)  Mr. Cisco went on to say that two weeks after the incident occurred, Parris told him that she made up the sexual assault she alleged against  Kelley because she hates all men due to something that occurred to her in prison. Mr. Cisco said is wife, expressed she is fearful to speak to me because she does not know what Ms. Parris might do to retaliate if she talked. Mr. Cisco said he would definitely be willing to come to court to testify against Ms. Parris. On Saturday, March 7,2020, I made contact with Mr. Cisco again and served him a trial court subpoena.                                              Sincerely, Rick Gove   Gove Enterprises Inc. Investigations 704 Main Street- Suite 305-1 Oregon City, Oregon 97045 Someone else will testify against Parris (see below) Gove Enterprises Inc.  Investigations 704 Main Street - Suite 305-1  Oregon City, OR 97045  INVESTIGATIVE REPORT  To: Barry Engle From: Rick Gove Date: April 1, 2020 RE: Themba Kelley Investigation  Michael Frank Moody Report  On Wednesday, March 25, 2020, 1 interviewed Michael Frank Moody, an inmate at the Multnomah County Inverness fail, SWIS # 808821, at phone number  I asked Mr. Moody if he knew a woman named Wendy Parris. He said that he did know her and had known her for about 2 years. Mr. Moody is homeless and prior to his incarceration he spent a lot of his time in downtown Portland in the vicinity of the Skidmore Fountain and the waterfront between the Burnside and Steel Bridges. Mr. Moody said he knows Ms. Parris because she also frequented this area.  I asked Mr. Moody if he had an opinion regarding Ms. Parris's reputation for honesty. He replied that she is known as a thief and to be very dishonest. Mr. Moody said that she manipulates any situation she gets in where she gets caught in her dishonesty and tries to shift the blame onto the person she is stealing from. Mr. Moody said when Ms. Parris gets caught in  property, she has a reputation for claiming that she is actually the victim. He said she is known for stealing people's property and if she gets caught in the act, then becoming a "damsel in distress" to manipulate the situation.  Mr. Moody gave an example of an incident that he witnessed where Ms. Parris was in a situation where she was stealing money from a man he knows, who he called "Josef" or "Joe the Muslim", and he heard "Joe" yelling “Give my money back" at Ms. Parris and she was yelling "help me, help me, this guy is trying to rape me!" Mr. Moody said he spoke with "Joe" and "Joe" told him he invited Ms. Parris into his tent and he saw her stealing some items and he told her to give his stuff back and then she started screaming that she was being beaten and he was trying to rape her.  Mr. Moody also gave an example of another time he saw Ms. Parris try to steal something, then get caught, then say that she was the victim. She said he was hanging out with a few men and they were all smoking meth and getting high. He said Ms. Parris walked up with her friend and they both started flirting with them. He said they invited her and her friend to smoke meth with them and while they were smoking everything good was fine, laughing and having a good time. Then when the meth was gone, Ms. Parris had his torch lighter. He asked for it back, and she said it was hers. He said no, then she started screaming "help help, he's trying to steal my stuff!" 

Defendant hereby moves to compel the video that has been lost due to the bad faith actions of DDA Nicole M. Hermann and the state of Oregon.     In an informal discovery demand, Defendant has demanded production of the video from Fred Meyer.  The history of this request is as follows:  On the day of the alleged incident, August 14, 2019, and in the days that followed, defense counsel met personally with and then was in communication with the lead police investigator Det. Tony Cobb, who was frankly very responsive.  In those first interactions at the scene, Cobb and defense counsel discussed the importance of certain pieces of video and the urgency in obtaining them.  The importance of the Fred Meyer video was discussed at that time.     From reports it is apparent that the task of obtaining the video was assigned to Gresham Police Detective Aaron Turnage who reported:     I drove to (Fred Meyer) and spoke to an unidentified member of management.  I explained I wanted to determine if any video was available for the evening of August 13, 20-19 and I provided the information from the receipt that was provided by the victim.  I was told that a member of loss prevention would contact me if video was available.  I was told loss prevention was not currently working and the members of management did not have access to the CCTV system.     I did not receive a call back from management or loss prevention.  I called the store on several different occasions and I was never able to contact anyone who could provide information; the business was not overly helpful or accommodating to my requests.     No video was recovered from this location. Turnage’s report regarding his efforts was not discovered until the end of November.  Up until then, the defense believed, based on Cobb’s testimony at grand jury, that the discovery of the recording was imminent.  Following receipt of Turnage’s report, defense investigator Frederick Gove easily contacted loss prevention at Fred Meyer Hawthorne on December 17, 2019.  He learned that Fred Meyer has a state-of-the-art system, that the video would have been available probably through October and that Fred Meyer policy is eager to cooperate with police.  Notably, if Turnage would have just gone to the store, they would have provided him footage.  The video was important to this case because Parris testified at grand jury that she and Kelley were in no way romantically involved on August 13, 2019.  This video would have demonstrated the falseness of this statement.  This discovery demand is made in anticipation of a motion to dismiss pursuant to Calfornia v. Trombetta, 467 US 479 (1984) and its progeny alleging that the spoliation of this evidence was in bad faith because the police were aware from the date of incident that the evidence was important, the police did not take even reasonable steps to secure it, that the government led the defense to believe that it was preserved, and that the government did not alert the defense when it became clear they were unable to secure it. CONCLUSION     The court should grant defendant’s motion to compel the production of the items listed on page one above.  Dated this 27 December 2019. MORE VIDEO FOOTAGE COMES UP MISSING!!!!!!!!!!                                      BARRY W. ENGLE PC  BELOW IS THE ACTUAL COURT RECORD CONVERSATION ABOUT THE "MULTIPLE"  MISSING VIDEO FOOTAGE 3 And then, finally, in regard to the 4 video surveillance, I told Your Honor that I've been 5 told that this video surveillance doesn't exist. 6 I've invited my investigator here, 7 Rick Gove, who is going to give us, I think, a 8 less-than-five-minute testimony about what he found 9 out about the Fred Meyer video. And, frankly, also 10 about the -- the 7-Eleven video that he went out and 11 investigated. 12 And I just want to make that part of the 13 record. And as I told Your Honor, you know, that's 14 fine if -- if we're being told that it's gone, that 15 we anticipate a motion pursuant to California v. 16 Trombetta talking about spoliation of evidence and 17 bad faith on the part of the -- on part of the police 18 or government investigators in that regard. 19 So I think I have to make a full -- a 20 full record regarding the motion to compel that we 21 took every step we could to get that and -- and that 22 it's not available. 23 So that's why I call Mr. Gove, is in 24 order to -- to complete that record here today. 25 That's what I have to say about the motion to compel. 20 1 I'd go ahead and call Mr. Gove if Your Honor's ready 2 for that. 3 THE COURT: Okay. He can come and sit 4 next to the DA and we can turn the microphone toward 5 him and we'll swear him in. 6 (Whispered discussion, off the record, 7 10:40 a.m.) 8 THE COURT: Please stand and raise your 9 right hand. 10 FREDERICK GOVE 11 Was thereupon called as a witness on behalf of the 12 Defendant; and, having been first duly sworn, was 13 examined and testified as follows: 14 THE CLERK: Thank you. 15 THE COURT: Okay. So, Mr. Gove. Oh, if 16 -- actually, if could state your name and spell your 17 name for the record. 18 THE WITNESS: Yes. Frederick Gove, 19 F-r-e-d-e-r-i-c-k, G-o-v-e. 20 THE COURT: And I'll hear your statement 21 regarding the video or if you want to ask questions, 22 you can do that. 23 MR. ENGLE: I'll just ask a couple quick 24 questions. 25 //// F. Gove - D 21 1 DIRECT EXAMINATION 2 BY MR. ENGLE: 3 Q So just tell us your -- your background and 4 your qualifications to be a private investigator. 5 A I have a juris doctor degree and I've been 6 a member of the Oregon State Bar since 1994. And I 7 got my investigator's license in 2001. 8 Q Are you currently licensed by the State of 9 Oregon to be a private investigator by the DP -- 10 DPST? 11 A Yes. 12 Q And, in that regard, do you -- do 13 investigations hired by me in regard to criminal 14 cases that I'm working on? 15 A Yes. 16 Q And did you do so in the case of Mr. 17 Kelley? 18 A I did. 19 Q And did you look into the availability of 20 video into both the Fred Meyer and the 7-Eleven 21 regarding this case? 22 A Yes. 23 Q And just tell us what happened, what'd you 24 find out, first in regard to the Fred Meyer. 25 A I contacted the -- the manager of their F. Gove - D 22 1 Loss Prevention Department at the Hawthorne Fred 2 Meyer on Southeast 39th. And he told me -- well, 3 first of all, I asked him if the -- I -- I talked to 4 him on mid-December, I believe December 17th. And 5 the incident date on this was August 13th or -- 12th 6 or 13th, approximately. 7 I asked him if that video would still be 8 available. He said it's not. It's only available 9 for -- for 45 to 60 days after the date of recording 10 and then it's written over or deleted. 11 I asked him if -- if someone had come and 12 asked for it, either a police officer or a private 13 investigator had come and asked for it in that time 14 period that it was available, if that would have been 15 something that they would have given. And he said it 16 would have been. 17 I asked him if he recalled if someone came 18 and asked for that surveillance. He said he didn't 19 recall because they get about one request per week 20 from Portland Police Bureau for surveillance. And he 21 said that they always comply. They never blow them 22 off or disregard their requests. 23 He said they reply with every request that 24 they get. And he did not recall any requests that 25 had come that they didn't reply to. He did mention F. Gove - D 23 1 that, at that time, they were understaffed in the 2 Loss Prevention Department and that it would have 3 been likely that if someone was just trying to call 4 them on the phone, they would not have received -- or 5 they would not have answered the phone because all 6 their staff were out on the floor. And he said they 7 don't really check their messages, so he said that 8 would not have been a good way to get in touch with 9 them. 10 And I asked him if they had come down in 11 person and -- and asked for a loss prevention 12 officer, if they would have -- one would have come to 13 meet them. He said absolutely, that they always do 14 that. So he said if someone had come asking for the 15 footage, they would have given it to them. 16 Q And can you describe what happened in 17 regard to the Plaid Pantry -- or I'm sorry, the 18 7-Eleven? 19 A Yeah. I -- I went out to the 7-Eleven just 20 a couple weeks ago. I've been trying to call them 21 without much luck and so I eventually went out there 22 and I spoke with a manager there. 23 He -- I asked him specifically if he -- 24 well, they -- the notes that I read from the police 25 officer or the detective who tried to find the F. Gove - D 24 1 surveillance said that they went to the store, but 2 were told that there was no surveillance cameras 3 operating at that particular time. 4 But they did have -- so of -- of the 5 exterior cameras, but they did have interior camera 6 footage, which was provided. So I wanted to 7 determine if -- if -- what the situation was with the 8 exterior footage. So I went and talked to the 9 manager. And, again, you know, we're talking about 10 four months after the fact. 11 So he didn't have specific memory, but he 12 did recall that at some point in the summer -- and -- 13 before I say that, he also said that they often get 14 police coming to ask for their surveillance there. 15 They're on a major intersection of Southeast Stark 16 and 168th, I believe. 17 So he said they -- the police had come at 18 some point and asked for their external footage. And 19 how he described it is their internal surveillance 20 footage is provided by the corporation. The external 21 footage is -- was put there by the franchise owner of 22 that particular store. 23 So the corporation controls the interior 24 and the franchise owner control the exterior, so 25 they're two different systems. And he said the F. Gove - D 25 1 exterior footage, the police had come and asked for 2 the entire computer that they had and they took that 3 computer. He said that they told him that they would 4 return that computer or replace it, but they 5 never did. 6 And then he said at a later date -- I asked 7 him if anyone had -- any police officers had come and 8 asked him for footage and he told the police that 9 they didn't have exterior footage, if that had 10 happened after the police had taken the camera -- or 11 the -- the computer. 12 And he said that that had happened, so that 13 computer was gone and then the police came and asked 14 for it and they had to tell them they didn't have it. 15 So, at that point, I don't know if that was the 16 situation where they came for the August 12th or 13th 17 footage, but it -- it seemed to comply with what was 18 in the officer's report. 19 Q In other words, you don't know if the one 20 where the took the device and didn't bring it back 21 was the Kelley matter or the one where they asked for 22 it and the other cops had taken it or if that was 23 completely two different machines? You're not sure? 24 A I'm not sure. And the -- the manager 25 didn't -- he didn't have any log information or any F. Gove - D 26 1 dates or any paperwork to -- to kind of pinpoint the 2 dates on it. 3 MR. ENGLE: That's all the questions I 4 have for Mr. Gove. 5 THE COURT: Do you have any questions, 6 Ms. Hermann? 7 MS. HERMANN: I don't.

I was TRAUMATIZED... by the "VIRUS" of "FALSE ACCUSATIONS","GRAND JURY PERJURY""PROSECUTORIAL RACISM" and "REPEATED" SLANDER COMING FROM THE MEDIA. I am only one out of many that this has happened to! BLACK PEOPLE DESERVE BETTER THIS!!! And,everyone also deserves their fair day in court. IF YOU ARE SOMEONE WHO WILL WRITE ANY "BLACK PERSON"OFF AS GUILTY, SIMPLY BECAUSE THE " WHITE" OWNED AND RUN MEDIA SAYS THEY ARE, " you are just as much a part of the problem as they are. Themba

To this date Themba Hasaan Kelley (Temba Spirit) has NEVER been convicted of a sex-offense according to Oregon Law. Nonetheless, the local media has NEVER reported that legal reality. What they have done is reported the "racially biased" AND ILLEGALLY MALICIOUS STATE sanctioned narrative that they have received from Multnomah County's District Attorney's office. This is how they deceive " WE THE PEOPLE" and also inject the disease of racism into the subconsciousness of the gullable community. THE DEFENSE TEAM never has the chance to report their side of the story; which in it self PROVES THE POINT! Do you get it ??? The first and only narative that hits the ears of the public comes from the arresting police and the district attorney's office. Consequently, this is how Black Men are repeatedly traumatized and also crucified by and in the eyes of the community. The media has been used in this racist way ever since it has been erected. The deceived population does not seem to understand that what is written by the media and what is presented as actual EVIDENCED REALITY in the court room, are 2 different things. For example: In 2014, The Honorable Judge Kathleen Dailey ( A WHITE FEMALE JUDGE) ruled that Temba ( A Black Man) WAS NOT a sex-offender and therefore WAS NOT required to register. This was after he was accused of having a highly charged sexual conversation with a Baskin Robbins store manager. The plaintiff was in the store by herself at 9:45 PM counting money, cleaning up and preparing to close. Themba allegedly entered the store and had a highly charged flirtacious conversation with her. He admittedly was heavily intoxicated and homeless. After Themba left the store he went to a bar up the street. The police then pulled into the lot as Themba was on the back smoking a cigarette with a bartender. Not thinking they were there for him, he didn't feel the need to run, nor was he alarmed. The police just sat there. Themba then got back on his bike and attempted to leave the lot. The police stopped him and asked had he just left Baskin Robbins? He then replied yes, "what is the problem, I was just flirting with a female in there?" The officer then replied, " did you know she was 16? " Themba then replied again, " she was managing the store? How would i have known that!? " Not having anything to charge him, they then had him sit outside for about an hour before they arrested him. Note: according to Themba's attorney Brianne Sponcee's, it was not the girl at the store who called the police. Because she was a little late getting home, her mom called her concerned. She explained to her mom that she had been speaking to this Black guy and her mother called the police. The local media reported the story as if Themba had been lurking outside of high schools hoping to violate the pristine pure under age sexual "whiteness" of Portland's females. How utterly racist. In truth, he was homeless and had been up for days and was in a state of diminished capacity intoxication. Prior to him bicycling passed the Baskin Robbins, he was at a another bar. Do people hang out at bars after hours who are lurking around for under age females? Of course they don't! Nonetheless, the DAs office was determined to use this accusation, "luring a minor" as ammunition to make Themba have to register for the rest of his life as a S.O. HOWEVER: The Honorable Judge Kathleen Daily ( a White female Judge) wasn't having it! She saw through the DA's office's nonsense. After, Themba plead put to the "luring" his attorney discovered away that the "s.o" registration could be challenged. His defense team was able to bring the case back up under senate bill 30. It was tried and on that day Themba became the first person in the history of Oregon Law, to beat the charge " failure to register " as a sex offender after Your Honor Dailey determined that he was not a sex offender! HOWEVER: NOT ONE LOCAL MEDIA OUTLET REPORTED THIS GROUND BREAKING VICTORY! Probably because, at that trial, Temba, (a Black Man) became the first and only person in the history of Oregon Law to beat the charge "failure to register as a sex-offender," after Judge Dailey ruled that Temba WAS NOT a Sex offender and therefore DID NOT have to register. The mere fact that A WHITE "FEMALE" Judged ruled in A BLACK MANS FAVOR, particularly where alleged sex crimes were involved, ought to make a person with "common sense" question the whole got-damn thing! ALL the other judges Themba was in front of were WHITE MALES. NOTE: At some point during the so-called "luring" case, Themba's attorney Brianne Sponcee's had the person who wrote the statute for the charge "luring a minor" review Themba's file. After thoroughly reviewing Themba's file, the person who wrote the luring statute determined that THEMBA DID NOT COMMIT THE CRIME "LURING". After Themba's attorney discovered this, he contacted Themba and told him this and because of his discovery insisted that they go to trial. The local media never reported any of this. AND HERE IS THE SIMPLE QUESTION??? Why do the Multnomah county media outlets still have Themba listed as a Sex Offender WHEN HE IS NOT??? It's simple: They are more concerned with sensationalism and abusing their write to "freedom" of the press then they are with exposing the truth. Moreover, they also know that the average citizen does not have the financial leverage to sue them, nor to properly defend themselves in court. They report whatever they want in order to traumatize Black people and control the minds of the public. If you cannot see the racism in that, your common-sense faculty's have been thoroughly corrupted. And its even deeper than that! After Judge Dailey ruled in Temba's favor, She pulled both Themba's attorney Lee Wachoki and DA Christine Mascal into her inner chambers. She then looked directly into DA's Mascal's face and said, " PERSONAL VENDETTA'S NEVER WORK DO THEY?". In other words , Judge Dailey considered the prosecution to be personal, biased and not Constitutional. And get this! DA Mascal is no longer a DA. She is now a criminal defense attorney. FACT CHECK THAT! In fact, she just recently defended a Black Man who was falsely accused of sex crimes and they won! It seems DA MASCAL learned her lesson. That is the power of Love working through Justice and Justice working through Love.( L.A.W) LAST! Why would a Black community, or even a CONSCIOUS White Community, EVER ASSUME, that an ALL-WHITE OWNED AND RUN MEDIA , WOULD "EVER" REPORT the LEGAL REALITY ABOUT ANYTHING ASSOCIATED WITH A BLACK PERSON??? Would a White community "RELY" upon a ALL BLACK OWNED AND RUN media to report the legal reality about them??? HELL NO THEY WOULD NOT! CASE CLOSED! CASE DISMISSED...... L.A.W Feel free to call officer Dale in the sex registration office @ 503-934-1258 to confirm that Themba Kelley IS NOT A Sex offender. IN CONCLUSUION: The Multnomah county's DA's office has lost all prosecutorial credibility. The initially tried to accuse Themba of sex crimes associated with teens; THAT DID NOT WORK. After they failed there, they upgraded and attempted to use a 43 year old white female meth/ heroine addict to get their malicious job done. That failed! The DA's office's extreme level's of intentionally condoned false accusations in the Wendy Parris racist rape case, allows us to easily see that they have not prosecuted Themba with equal justice in any of the cases. THIS IS NOT ROCKET SCIENCE: Way back in 2014, did a Judge reprimand a DA in Themba's situation for prosecuting him vindictively. This calls into question EVERYTHING that has occurred since then. Mutlnomah county's DA's office has lost all prosecutorial credibility. Hopefully the new head DA Mike Schmitt will remedy this severely concerning issue.

THE W.HAYWOOD BURNS INSTITUTE HAS VERY SUCCINCTLY DOCUMENTED THE "PROSECUTORIAL RACISM" COMING OUT OF THE DA'S OFFICE IN MULTNOMAH COUNTY.